Friday, February 1, 2013

Company Analysis - Orient Bell



About Company / Industry

Orient Bell is a 110 cr company in business of manufacturing and selling Ceramic, Vitrified, Ultra vitrified and Decorative tiles. In 2010 Orient Ceramics acquired Bell Ceramics and later merged it with itself. With this acquisition Orient’s production capacity increased to about 30 million square meter per annum with manufacturing facilities are located at Sikandrabad (UP), Dora (Gujarat) and Hoskote (Karnataka).

Company sells their products through dealers and retailers. Company is having a marketing network with about 2500 dealers, 9000 Retailers and 30 Stock points. Region wise contribution of sales is close to 41% from North India, 33% from South, 17 % from East and 9 % from West.

Company is selling its products under three different brands – Orient, Orient International and Bell. Out of these orient International is selling premium imported tiles from Italy, Spain, etc. Company owns a design studio in Castellon, Spain and design head is from Spain, based out in Sikundrabad / Head Office.

At the time of acquisition, Bell was making losses. Current management has turned it around and made profitable.

Indian Ceramics organized tiles market is around Rs.8000 Cr and Orient’s main competitors are Kajaria,. Somany Ceramics, Nitco (loss making unit and now under CDR), HR Johnson, etc. Orient is one of the largest player in this industry with a market share close to 12 -15 %.

Industry is cyclic in nature and characterized by high fuel cost, high competition and high working capital requirement.

Financials

Company has turnover of around 550 cr and market cap of 110 cr. Company has been able to grow at ~20% in last 5 years on the back of recent acquisition and capacity addition. Profit of around 2.2 cr in 2008 has increased to ~12 cr in FY 2012. They were able to maintain operating margins in the range of 12-15% in past, which has gone down to ~9% since acquisition of Bell.

Financials of Company has been very dynamic in recent years. In 2008-09 they tighten up the working capital and reduced debts. Due to acquisition of Bell and debt acquired with Bell – their debt level has gone up to more than 190 cr from earlier approx 100 cr, Inventory shoot up, receivable gone up, but overall impact on working capital is not huge compared to all these increases.

In case Company is able to manage the working capital and able to improve the operations efficiency - cash from operations should be enough for them to reduce the debt in next 2-3 years.

Some of the other options with management to re-pay the debt:
  • By selling real estate at Kakinada, which was acquired for new plant and after takeover of Bell they do not have plan to develop that location in near future. 
  • By issuing fresh equity. 
Positive
  • Efficient management - Their recent acquisition of loss making Bell Ceramics turned it around within one and a half year proves their capabilities.
  • They have excess land in existing plants to increase capacity and with current 65%-70% utilization of installed capacity, they do not need major capex in near future, while maintaining a growth of 15-20%.
  • They have good dealer network on all India basis. Their design studio in Spain is taking care of good design and adding some innovations like ‘germ free’, high strength, etc.
  • They are also carrying out trials to use the local clay for manufacturing to avoid transportation cost. I am not too sure if this will work out well – but it shows their good intention to run the operations as effecient as possible.
  • Fuel cost consists about 35% of the production cost of Tiles manufacturing. On commissioning of Ratnagiri-Bangalore Gas pipeline in 2013, their Hoskote (Karnataka) plant should be able to get gas from GAIL. This will enable them to save fuel cost.
  • Company is an uninterrupted dividend payer for past many years.
  • 50 cr worth of accumulated tax losses in Bell will provide some tax comfort and help in paying debt.
  • Promoters were buying shares from open market and their current share holding is around 75%.
Negative / Risks
  • High debt (D/E>1)
  • Cyclic nature of industry and depend on the infrastructure / housing
  • Promoters investing in retail – no clear info on investment amount and going aggressive may result in loosing / blocking cash in below average returns.
Management
  • Salary is being on higher side. Total salary for both father & son duo is around 10% of profit as per regulations. This is a bit negative. 2 times in 3 years, owner salary increased limit (10% of profit) – both year salary increased from previous years
  • Resources allocation seems to be reasonably good
  • Details in AR seem to be fine.
  • Related party transactions – there are some transactions between Company and promoter companies, but nothing seems to be abnormal.
  • Not sure why they have taken foreign currency loan of 14 cr and same time not sure why they purchased a Hong Kong based marketing company.

Valuation


Company is available at PE of 7.3 (TTM basis) and 0.6x book value.

Sales basis:

Comparing with Kajaria Ceramics: Kajaria is valued around 1.4 x turn over, while Orient Bell with a turnover close to Rs. 550 Cr is currently valued around 0.2 x turnover - market cap of Rs.125 Cr. This is 7 times difference in valuation on the basis of turnover multiple. This difference is mainly due to high debt of Orient Bell, brand value / lead position of Kajaria, risk associated with loss making acquisition and past performance record of Orient Bell. I expect this valuation gap to reduce a bit as Orient Bell start paying down debt and operations at ex-Bell unit stabilizes. Wide network of dealers is a moat for them and they should be able to utilize this to their advantage. 50 cr of accumulated tax losses are going to provide relief in taxes in future. Even if marker value Orient Bell to around half of current turnover in future, Company value should be more than double now. OR considering current market valuation (0.2x turnover) and with management target of 1500  cr turnover in next few years, Company should trade close to 300 cr or more than double from now.

DCF / Other method based:

With various valuation methods, considering lower range of past performance, Company should be valued at around 190-220 cr.

My 2 cents
Company seems to be under valued for investment with fair bit of risk attached to it. Company may continue to report quiet results for next few quarters before showing improvement.

What could be triggers to unlock the value of Company?

  • Reduction in debt
  • Growth in turn over and improvement in margin. This will indicate that operational efficiencies at Ex- Bell plant has been improved. 

Disclosures: I hold a small position to track the stock. Please note that this is not a recommendation to buy or sell. Please do your own check before investment.


Friday, January 25, 2013

Selling decision

Normally we expect to buy a company stock at a sufficient discount to intrinsic value and sell it when market price is close to intrinsic value.  

As it may not appear, but selling a stock generally is a more difficult decision than buying a stock. It is not only emotional attachment with the company, but fear that price may further go up and particularly a bit more difficult when returns are linked to tax.

As all of us must be aware that capital gain tax on long term stock holdings (more than 1 year) is NIL in India. Hence when we are holding company stock quoting close to intrinsic value, while holding period is less than 1 year, we try not to sell but hold for more than 1 year and avoid paying tax. I have done this few times in past.  



Irrational decision

Recently I started to believe this being an irrational decision. Let me try to explain this:

We try to buy company at significant discount to IV(intrinsic value) and sell at around IV. Our aim is to get maximum return on the invested capital. For example, I bought a company stock with a discount of 50% to IV. if market price goes close to IV, theoretically I am getting 100% return. Assume worst case company is quoting at IV after 11 months from the shares purchased. Now question is - shall I wait for another month to sell off or sell off right now?

If I sell off my holding, my annual returns are 100/11x12=109% and after paying tax of 15%=93%. while from this point of time to 1 more month, quote may go up or down. 


Let us evaluate decision to sell in 11 month:

Positive
  • Company is quoting at or close to IV. So my investment purpose is achieved, assuming IV of Company is not increasing.
  • Company may not quote around IV in near future, hence selling will not affect my returns in future.
  • I will have extra cash to invest in new opportunities.
  • Avoiding risk of any new negative development in company, which could affect the IV of company.

Negative

  • I need to pay 15% tax on return, hence lowering my return on investment.
  • Company quote may go up far beyond IV, due to market irrationality or any positive development, hence I may loose extra return.
  • I may not find attractive idea, IV of company increases and I have to keep the money idle.



There may be more positive or negative reasons to sell the stock at IV, irrespective of holding duration. The question is where we go?

My 2 cents

I am starting to believe now, that selling decision shall be based on the current understanding of company, with out considering the market outlook and tax impact.

The reason being I can not predict the future of market or direction in which quote will move. I can only estimate the fair value of the company. If I can not see more value in company, it is better to sell it off and wait for new ideas than hoping market to be irrational and quote far more then fair value. This approach may not be correct for all cases and shall be applied on case to case basis. 

In the end, this reasoning may looks very simple, but very difficult in practice.

Friday, January 11, 2013

Stock investing vs real estate (bet)

As noted in my Introductory post, I started investing in stocks from 2008. Since then I am able to achieve 15% + annual return on investment in stocks and I am happy with it. If somebody has made investment in real estate around 2009 end in NCR, he is now sitting on 3-4 times returns on investment (assuming he / she made 100% down payment). If he / she took loan, returns will be much more. This situation could be similar else where in India.


Which way would you prefer?


I do not know about others, but I would still prefer to invest in stocks. This doesn't mean that I do not own or never buy real state. I did purchase an apartment but that's for my own use.

For me investing in real estate is risky and if situation like US happens in India (though unlikely in near future), you will be in big trouble.


Why real estate investment is risky

I do not know how to value real estate properties. If you value the property on the basis of rent yield ( net of maintenance expenses) you would find the price very expensive, as effective rent yield would not be more than 2% (that too after developer deliver the property with in schedule). So I should spaculate an appreciation in property price of around 10-12% to justify the investment (assuming i am happy with 12-14% return). I personally instead of spaculation, would rather prefer to deposite the money in bank and earn risk free (almost) interest, multiple time rent yield. In India, real estate value does not depend on the demand and supply situation, infrastructure, etc but on developers, whom practically dictate the price. A nice article on how things are moving now. Still I do not have any tool or source to know this in advance, hence I am incompetent to do proper valuation of real estate.

What is the difference?

Main difference between real estate and stock investing is associated assets. Though real estate has some use, but they are not productive like stocks (read Company). In case of economic problems, Stocks / Companies can survive by their productive activities, but very likely real estate price will drop (or you will not find any buyer) significantly, as their productive return is very low (2% of rental yield). I am not mentioning GOLD here, which has no productive value and even worst than real estate in this perspective.

Another difference is liquidity: In case of urgent need, stocks can be sold with in current market value in very quick time, while selling a property can easily take few months unless you are willing to sell it to a significant discount to market price (and that too may take considerable time).


Having siad that, I think no body will loose money in real estate in India as 100% of politicians money is into real estate (I have never heard any politician investing in share market) and they will ensure that real estate price remains buoyant forever :-).


Saturday, May 15, 2010

Tale of Bajajs

I started investing in stock market through Equity Mutual Funds, using SIP, in 2006. I used to buy additional units, whenever market was down. Overall returns were amazing - but till the end of 2007 only.

As index started moving down in 2008 - instead of adding MF units - this time I decided to try my hands in stock market directly. Reasons:

- Watching shares moving 20% up in a day. Why can't I select such stocks and become rich overnight???
- why I let other people manage my money and pay fee? I am smart enough to manage my own money!

I started buying stocks of different companies. Selection criteria:

- Praise on newspaper / TV
- Company I like for it's product
- Green technology - Suzlon
- Corporate Action (Split / De-merger)

Practically, I was not valuing the company at all. A drop of 20-30% in the share price from 52 weeks high was enough for me to load the shares of companies.

One of such company was Bajaj Auto. I bought the shares at an average of 2200. Bajaj Auto separated into 3 companies - Bajaj Holdings & Investment (Holding company), Bajaj Auto (Auto Business) and Bajaj Finserv (Insurance & financing business). After the split, shares of each entity were listed, I was down about 50% or so at that time.


But by that time I learned a bit about investing and valuation, mainly form Rohit Chouhan's blog. I added shares of each entity, after evaluating the fair value, between Oct, 08 & May, 09.

I sold off Bajaj Auto in Dec, 09 (too early in hindsight, as price zoomed to ~3000 or so with in few months). I sold off Bajaj Holding & Bajaj Finserve in May, 10.

IRR was 25% on my investment on Bajaj. Great....No!!!

In the end I was lucky to make such returns with out evaluating companies, thanks to world wide crash in 2008 and some good blogs on value investing.

Lesson - Never invest without properly evaluating company, as you may not be lucky each time (Or stop watching TV and reading recommendations on newspaper, etc).

Thanks
Investing Thoughts